2AD5

Mechanisms of feedback regulation and drug resistance of CTP synthetases: structure of the E. coli CTPS/CTP complex at 2.8-Angstrom resolution.


Experimental Data Snapshot

  • Method: X-RAY DIFFRACTION
  • Resolution: 2.80 Å
  • R-Value Free: 0.277 
  • R-Value Work: 0.202 
  • R-Value Observed: 0.202 

Starting Model: experimental
View more details

wwPDB Validation   3D Report Full Report


Ligand Structure Quality Assessment 


This is version 1.5 of the entry. See complete history


Literature

Mechanisms of Product Feedback Regulation and Drug Resistance in Cytidine Triphosphate Synthetases from the Structure of a CTP-Inhibited Complex(,).

Endrizzi, J.A.Kim, H.Anderson, P.M.Baldwin, E.P.

(2005) Biochemistry 44: 13491-13499

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/bi051282o
  • Primary Citation of Related Structures:  
    2AD5

  • PubMed Abstract: 

    Cytidine triphosphate synthetases (CTPSs) synthesize CTP and regulate its intracellular concentration through direct interactions with the four ribonucleotide triphosphates. In particular, CTP product is a feedback inhibitor that competes with UTP substrate. Selected CTPS mutations that impart resistance to pyrimidine antimetabolite inhibitors also relieve CTP inhibition and cause a dramatic increase in intracellular CTP concentration, indicating that the drugs act by binding to the CTP inhibitory site. Resistance mutations map to a pocket that, although adjacent, does not coincide with the expected UTP binding site in apo Escherichia coli CTPS [EcCTPS; Endrizzi, J. A., et al. (2004) Biochemistry 43, 6447-6463], suggesting allosteric rather than competitive inhibition. Here, bound CTP and ADP were visualized in catalytically active EcCTPS crystals soaked in either ATP and UTP substrates or ADP and CTP products. The CTP cytosine ring resides in the pocket predicted by the resistance mutations, while the triphosphate moiety overlaps the putative UTP triphosphate binding site, explaining how CTP competes with UTP while CTP resistance mutations are acquired without loss of catalytic efficiency. Extensive complementarity and interaction networks at the interfacial binding sites provide the high specificity for pyrimidine triphosphates and mediate nucleotide-dependent tetramer formation. Overall, these results depict a novel product inhibition strategy in which shared substrate and product moieties bind to a single subsite while specificity is conferred by separate subsites. This arrangement allows for independent adaptation of UTP and CTP binding affinities while efficiently utilizing the enzyme surface.


  • Organizational Affiliation

    Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of California, One Shields Avenue, Davis, California 95616, USA.


Macromolecules
Find similar proteins by:  (by identity cutoff)  |  3D Structure
Entity ID: 1
MoleculeChains Sequence LengthOrganismDetailsImage
CTP synthase
A, B
545Escherichia coli K-12Mutation(s): 0 
EC: 6.3.4.2
UniProt
Find proteins for P0A7E5 (Escherichia coli (strain K12))
Explore P0A7E5 
Go to UniProtKB:  P0A7E5
Entity Groups  
Sequence Clusters30% Identity50% Identity70% Identity90% Identity95% Identity100% Identity
UniProt GroupP0A7E5
Sequence Annotations
Expand
  • Reference Sequence
Small Molecules
Binding Affinity Annotations 
IDSourceBinding Affinity
CTP PDBBind:  2AD5 Ki: 1.10e+5 (nM) from 1 assay(s)
Experimental Data & Validation

Experimental Data

  • Method: X-RAY DIFFRACTION
  • Resolution: 2.80 Å
  • R-Value Free: 0.277 
  • R-Value Work: 0.202 
  • R-Value Observed: 0.202 
  • Space Group: P 21 21 2
Unit Cell:
Length ( Å )Angle ( ˚ )
a = 163.27α = 90
b = 106.38β = 90
c = 130.47γ = 90
Software Package:
Software NamePurpose
MOSFLMdata reduction
SCALAdata scaling
TNTrefinement
CCP4data scaling
TNTphasing

Structure Validation

View Full Validation Report



Ligand Structure Quality Assessment 


Entry History 

Deposition Data

Revision History  (Full details and data files)

  • Version 1.0: 2005-11-01
    Type: Initial release
  • Version 1.1: 2008-04-30
    Changes: Version format compliance
  • Version 1.2: 2011-07-13
    Changes: Derived calculations, Version format compliance
  • Version 1.3: 2014-11-12
    Changes: Structure summary
  • Version 1.4: 2023-08-23
    Changes: Data collection, Database references, Derived calculations, Refinement description
  • Version 1.5: 2024-11-13
    Changes: Structure summary