1EGN

CELLOBIOHYDROLASE CEL7A (E223S, A224H, L225V, T226A, D262G) MUTANT


Experimental Data Snapshot

  • Method: X-RAY DIFFRACTION
  • Resolution: 1.60 Å
  • R-Value Free: 0.270 
  • R-Value Work: 0.240 
  • R-Value Observed: 0.240 

wwPDB Validation   3D Report Full Report


Ligand Structure Quality Assessment 


This is version 2.3 of the entry. See complete history


Literature

Engineering of a glycosidase Family 7 cellobiohydrolase to more alkaline pH optimum: the pH behaviour of Trichoderma reesei Cel7A and its E223S/ A224H/L225V/T226A/D262G mutant.

Becker, D.Braet, C.Brumer III, H.Claeyssens, M.Divne, C.Fagerstrom, B.R.Harris, M.Jones, T.A.Kleywegt, G.J.Koivula, A.Mahdi, S.Piens, K.Sinnott, M.L.Stahlberg, J.Teeri, T.T.Underwood, M.Wohlfahrt, G.

(2001) Biochem J 356: 19-30

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1042/0264-6021:3560019
  • Primary Citation of Related Structures:  
    1EGN

  • PubMed Abstract: 

    The crystal structures of Family 7 glycohydrolases suggest that a histidine residue near the acid/base catalyst could account for the higher pH optimum of the Humicola insolens endoglucanase Cel7B, than the corresponding Trichoderma reesei enzymes. Modelling studies indicated that introduction of histidine at the homologous position in T. reesei Cel7A (Ala(224)) required additional changes to accommodate the bulkier histidine side chain. X-ray crystallography of the catalytic domain of the E223S/A224H/L225V/T226A/D262G mutant reveals that major differences from the wild-type are confined to the mutations themselves. The introduced histidine residue is in plane with its counterpart in H. insolens Cel7B, but is 1.0 A (=0.1 nm) closer to the acid/base Glu(217) residue, with a 3.1 A contact between N(epsilon2) and O(epsilon1). The pH variation of k(cat)/K(m) for 3,4-dinitrophenyl lactoside hydrolysis was accurately bell-shaped for both wild-type and mutant, with pK(1) shifting from 2.22+/-0.03 in the wild-type to 3.19+/-0.03 in the mutant, and pK(2) shifting from 5.99+/-0.02 to 6.78+/-0.02. With this poor substrate, the ionizations probably represent those of the free enzyme. The relative k(cat) for 2-chloro-4-nitrophenyl lactoside showed similar behaviour. The shift in the mutant pH optimum was associated with lower k(cat)/K(m) values for both lactosides and cellobiosides, and a marginally lower stability. However, k(cat) values for cellobiosides are higher for the mutant. This we attribute to reduced non-productive binding in the +1 and +2 subsites; inhibition by cellobiose is certainly relieved in the mutant. The weaker binding of cellobiose is due to the loss of two water-mediated hydrogen bonds.


  • Organizational Affiliation

    Department of Paper Science, University of Manchester Institute of Science and Technology, P.O. Box 88, Sackville Street, Manchester M60 lQD, UK.


Macromolecules
Find similar proteins by:  (by identity cutoff)  |  3D Structure
Entity ID: 1
MoleculeChains Sequence LengthOrganismDetailsImage
1,4-BETA-D-GLUCAN CELLOBIOHYDROLASE CEL7A434Trichoderma reeseiMutation(s): 5 
EC: 3.2.1.91
UniProt
Find proteins for P62694 (Hypocrea jecorina)
Explore P62694 
Go to UniProtKB:  P62694
Entity Groups  
Sequence Clusters30% Identity50% Identity70% Identity90% Identity95% Identity100% Identity
UniProt GroupP62694
Glycosylation
Glycosylation Sites: 1
Sequence Annotations
Expand
  • Reference Sequence
Small Molecules
Experimental Data & Validation

Experimental Data

  • Method: X-RAY DIFFRACTION
  • Resolution: 1.60 Å
  • R-Value Free: 0.270 
  • R-Value Work: 0.240 
  • R-Value Observed: 0.240 
  • Space Group: I 2 2 2
Unit Cell:
Length ( Å )Angle ( ˚ )
a = 83.11α = 90
b = 83.34β = 90
c = 110.61γ = 90
Software Package:
Software NamePurpose
DENZOdata reduction
SCALEPACKdata scaling
CNSrefinement
CNSphasing

Structure Validation

View Full Validation Report



Ligand Structure Quality Assessment 


Entry History 

Deposition Data

Revision History  (Full details and data files)

  • Version 1.0: 2001-05-16
    Type: Initial release
  • Version 1.1: 2008-04-27
    Changes: Version format compliance
  • Version 1.2: 2011-07-13
    Changes: Non-polymer description, Version format compliance
  • Version 1.3: 2018-01-24
    Changes: Database references
  • Version 1.4: 2018-01-31
    Changes: Database references
  • Version 2.0: 2019-12-25
    Changes: Data collection, Database references, Derived calculations, Polymer sequence
  • Version 2.1: 2020-07-29
    Type: Remediation
    Reason: Carbohydrate remediation
    Changes: Data collection, Derived calculations, Structure summary
  • Version 2.2: 2021-11-03
    Changes: Database references, Structure summary
  • Version 2.3: 2024-10-09
    Changes: Data collection, Structure summary