1SWP

CORE-STREPTAVIDIN MUTANT W120F IN COMPLEX WITH BIOTIN AT PH 7.5


Experimental Data Snapshot

  • Method: X-RAY DIFFRACTION
  • Resolution: 2.00 Å
  • R-Value Free: 0.329 
  • R-Value Observed: 0.251 

Starting Model: experimental
View more details

wwPDB Validation   3D Report Full Report


Ligand Structure Quality Assessment 


This is version 1.5 of the entry. See complete history


Literature

Structural studies of binding site tryptophan mutants in the high-affinity streptavidin-biotin complex.

Freitag, S.Le Trong, I.Chilkoti, A.Klumb, L.A.Stayton, P.S.Stenkamp, R.E.

(1998) J Mol Biol 279: 211-221

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/jmbi.1998.1735
  • Primary Citation of Related Structures:  
    1SWH, 1SWJ, 1SWK, 1SWL, 1SWN, 1SWO, 1SWP, 1SWQ, 1SWR

  • PubMed Abstract: 

    Previous thermodynamic and computational studies have pointed to the important energetic role of aromatic contacts in generating the exceptional binding free energy of streptavidin-biotin association. We report here the crystallographic characterization of single site tryptophan mutants in investigating structural consequences of alterations in these aromatic contacts. Four tryptophan residues, Trp79, Trp92, Trp108 and Trp120, play an important role in the hydrophobic binding contributions, which along with a hydrogen bonding network and a flexible binding loop give rise to tight ligand binding (Ka approximately 10(13) M-1). The crystal structures of ligand-free and biotin-bound mutants, W79F, W108F, W120F and W120A, in the resolution range from 1.9 to 2.3 A were determined. Nine data sets for these four different mutants were collected, and structural models were refined to R-values ranging from 0.15 to 0.20. The major question addressed here is how these mutations influence the streptavidin binding site and in particular how they affect the binding mode of biotin in the complex. The overall folding of streptavidin was not significantly altered in any of the tryptophan mutants. With one exception, only minor deviations in the unbound structures were observed. In one crystal form of unbound W79F, there is a coupled shift in the side-chains of Phe29 and Tyr43 toward the mutation site, although in a different crystal form these shifts are not observed. In the bound structures, the orientation of biotin in the binding pocket was not significantly altered in the mutant complex. Compared with the wild-type streptavidin-biotin complex, there were no additional crystallographic water molecules observed for any of the mutants in the binding pocket. These structural studies thus suggest that the thermodynamic alterations can be attributed to the local alterations in binding residue composition, rather than a rearrangement of binding site architectures.


  • Organizational Affiliation

    Department of Biological Structure, University of Washington, Seattle 98195-7420, USA.


Macromolecules
Find similar proteins by:  (by identity cutoff)  |  3D Structure
Entity ID: 1
MoleculeChains Sequence LengthOrganismDetailsImage
CORE-STREPTAVIDIN
A, B, C, D
127Streptomyces avidiniiMutation(s): 1 
UniProt
Find proteins for P22629 (Streptomyces avidinii)
Explore P22629 
Go to UniProtKB:  P22629
Entity Groups  
Sequence Clusters30% Identity50% Identity70% Identity90% Identity95% Identity100% Identity
UniProt GroupP22629
Sequence Annotations
Expand
  • Reference Sequence
Small Molecules
Experimental Data & Validation

Experimental Data

  • Method: X-RAY DIFFRACTION
  • Resolution: 2.00 Å
  • R-Value Free: 0.329 
  • R-Value Observed: 0.251 
  • Space Group: P 1 21 1
Unit Cell:
Length ( Å )Angle ( ˚ )
a = 53.8α = 90
b = 100β = 112.6
c = 51.8γ = 90
Software Package:
Software NamePurpose
SHELXL-97model building
X-PLORmodel building
SHELXL-97refinement
X-PLORrefinement
SAINTdata reduction
SADABSdata scaling
SHELXL-97phasing
X-PLORphasing

Structure Validation

View Full Validation Report



Ligand Structure Quality Assessment 


Entry History 

Deposition Data

Revision History  (Full details and data files)

  • Version 1.0: 1999-02-09
    Type: Initial release
  • Version 1.1: 2008-03-03
    Changes: Version format compliance
  • Version 1.2: 2011-07-13
    Changes: Version format compliance
  • Version 1.3: 2022-12-21
    Changes: Database references, Derived calculations, Other
  • Version 1.4: 2023-08-09
    Changes: Refinement description
  • Version 1.5: 2024-05-22
    Changes: Data collection