3ZVA

3C protease of Enterovirus 68 complexed with Michael receptor inhibitor 75


Experimental Data Snapshot

  • Method: X-RAY DIFFRACTION
  • Resolution: 2.20 Å
  • R-Value Free: 0.236 
  • R-Value Work: 0.192 
  • R-Value Observed: 0.195 

Starting Model: experimental
View more details

wwPDB Validation   3D Report Full Report


Ligand Structure Quality Assessment 


This is version 1.6 of the entry. See complete history


Literature

3C Protease of Enterovirus 68: Structure-Based Design of Michael Acceptor Inhibitors and Their Broad-Spectrum Antiviral Effects Against Picornaviruses.

Tan, J.George, S.Kusov, Y.Perbandt, M.Anemuller, S.Mesters, J.R.Norder, H.Coutard, B.Lacroix, C.Leyssen, P.Neyts, J.Hilgenfeld, R.

(2013) J Virol 87: 4339

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.01123-12
  • Primary Citation of Related Structures:  
    3ZV8, 3ZV9, 3ZVA, 3ZVB, 3ZVC, 3ZVD, 3ZVE, 3ZVF, 3ZVG

  • PubMed Abstract: 

    We have determined the cleavage specificity and the crystal structure of the 3C protease of enterovirus 68 (EV68 3C(pro)). The protease exhibits a typical chymotrypsin fold with a Cys...His...Glu catalytic triad; its three-dimensional structure is closely related to that of the 3C(pro) of rhinovirus 2, as well as to that of poliovirus. The phylogenetic position of the EV68 3C(pro) between the corresponding enzymes of rhinoviruses on the one hand and classical enteroviruses on the other prompted us to use the crystal structure for the design of irreversible inhibitors, with the goal of discovering broad-spectrum antiviral compounds. We synthesized a series of peptidic α,β-unsaturated ethyl esters of increasing length and for each inhibitor candidate, we determined a crystal structure of its complex with the EV68 3C(pro), which served as the basis for the next design round. To exhibit inhibitory activity, compounds must span at least P3 to P1'; the most potent inhibitors comprise P4 to P1'. Inhibitory activities were found against the purified 3C protease of EV68, as well as with replicons for poliovirus and EV71 (50% effective concentration [EC(50)] = 0.5 μM for the best compound). Antiviral activities were determined using cell cultures infected with EV71, poliovirus, echovirus 11, and various rhinovirus serotypes. The most potent inhibitor, SG85, exhibited activity with EC(50)s of ≈180 nM against EV71 and ≈60 nM against human rhinovirus 14 in a live virus-cell-based assay. Even the shorter SG75, spanning only P3 to P1', displayed significant activity (EC(50) = 2 to 5 μM) against various rhinoviruses.


  • Organizational Affiliation

    Institute of Biochemistry, Center for Structural and Cell Biology in Medicine, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.


Macromolecules
Find similar proteins by:  (by identity cutoff)  |  3D Structure
Entity ID: 1
MoleculeChains Sequence LengthOrganismDetailsImage
3C PROTEASE190enterovirus D68Mutation(s): 0 
EC: 3.4.22.28
UniProt
Find proteins for A1E4A3 (Human enterovirus D68)
Explore A1E4A3 
Go to UniProtKB:  A1E4A3
Entity Groups  
Sequence Clusters30% Identity50% Identity70% Identity90% Identity95% Identity100% Identity
UniProt GroupA1E4A3
Sequence Annotations
Expand
  • Reference Sequence
Small Molecules
Ligands 1 Unique
IDChains Name / Formula / InChI Key2D Diagram3D Interactions
G75
Query on G75

Download Ideal Coordinates CCD File 
B [auth A]ETHYL (4R)-4-({N-[(BENZYLOXY)CARBONYL]-L-PHENYLALANYL}AMINO)-5-[(3S)-2-OXOPYRROLIDIN-3-YL]PENTANOATE
C28 H35 N3 O6
PIZHLOUXQJUQHF-VXNXHJTFSA-N
Experimental Data & Validation

Experimental Data

  • Method: X-RAY DIFFRACTION
  • Resolution: 2.20 Å
  • R-Value Free: 0.236 
  • R-Value Work: 0.192 
  • R-Value Observed: 0.195 
  • Space Group: P 31 2 1
Unit Cell:
Length ( Å )Angle ( ˚ )
a = 56.1α = 90
b = 56.1β = 90
c = 170.411γ = 120
Software Package:
Software NamePurpose
REFMACrefinement
iMOSFLMdata reduction
SCALAdata scaling
MOLREPphasing

Structure Validation

View Full Validation Report



Ligand Structure Quality Assessment 


Entry History 

Deposition Data

Revision History  (Full details and data files)

  • Version 1.0: 2012-08-08
    Type: Initial release
  • Version 1.1: 2013-02-27
    Changes: Database references
  • Version 1.2: 2013-04-10
    Changes: Database references
  • Version 1.3: 2018-04-11
    Changes: Data collection, Source and taxonomy
  • Version 1.4: 2019-05-08
    Changes: Data collection, Derived calculations, Experimental preparation
  • Version 1.5: 2023-12-20
    Changes: Data collection, Database references, Derived calculations, Other, Refinement description
  • Version 1.6: 2024-11-13
    Changes: Structure summary