4J8T | pdb_00004j8t

Engineered Digoxigenin binder DIG10.2


Experimental Data Snapshot

  • Method: X-RAY DIFFRACTION
  • Resolution: 2.05 Å
  • R-Value Free: 
    0.246 (Depositor), 0.240 (DCC) 
  • R-Value Work: 
    0.211 (Depositor), 0.200 (DCC) 
  • R-Value Observed: 
    0.213 (Depositor) 

wwPDB Validation   3D Report Full Report


Ligand Structure Quality Assessment 

Created with Raphaël 2.3.0Worse 01 BetterLigand structure goodness of fit to experimental dataBest fitted DOGClick on this verticalbar to view details

This is version 1.6 of the entry. See complete history


Literature

Computational design of ligand-binding proteins with high affinity and selectivity.

Tinberg, C.E.Khare, S.D.Dou, J.Doyle, L.Nelson, J.W.Schena, A.Jankowski, W.Kalodimos, C.G.Johnsson, K.Stoddard, B.L.Baker, D.

(2013) Nature 501: 212-216

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12443
  • Primary Citation of Related Structures:  
    4J8T, 4J9A

  • PubMed Abstract: 

    The ability to design proteins with high affinity and selectivity for any given small molecule is a rigorous test of our understanding of the physiochemical principles that govern molecular recognition. Attempts to rationally design ligand-binding proteins have met with little success, however, and the computational design of protein-small-molecule interfaces remains an unsolved problem. Current approaches for designing ligand-binding proteins for medical and biotechnological uses rely on raising antibodies against a target antigen in immunized animals and/or performing laboratory-directed evolution of proteins with an existing low affinity for the desired ligand, neither of which allows complete control over the interactions involved in binding. Here we describe a general computational method for designing pre-organized and shape complementary small-molecule-binding sites, and use it to generate protein binders to the steroid digoxigenin (DIG). Of seventeen experimentally characterized designs, two bind DIG; the model of the higher affinity binder has the most energetically favourable and pre-organized interface in the design set. A comprehensive binding-fitness landscape of this design, generated by library selections and deep sequencing, was used to optimize its binding affinity to a picomolar level, and X-ray co-crystal structures of two variants show atomic-level agreement with the corresponding computational models. The optimized binder is selective for DIG over the related steroids digitoxigenin, progesterone and β-oestradiol, and this steroid binding preference can be reprogrammed by manipulation of explicitly designed hydrogen-bonding interactions. The computational design method presented here should enable the development of a new generation of biosensors, therapeutics and diagnostics.


  • Organizational Affiliation

    Department of Biochemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.


Macromolecules
Find similar proteins by:  (by identity cutoff)  |  3D Structure
Entity ID: 1
MoleculeChains Sequence LengthOrganismDetailsImage
Engineered Digoxigenin binder protein DIG10.2
A, B, C, D
137Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1Mutation(s): 16 
Gene Names: PA3332
UniProt
Find proteins for Q9HYR3 (Pseudomonas aeruginosa (strain ATCC 15692 / DSM 22644 / CIP 104116 / JCM 14847 / LMG 12228 / 1C / PRS 101 / PAO1))
Explore Q9HYR3 
Go to UniProtKB:  Q9HYR3
Entity Groups  
Sequence Clusters30% Identity50% Identity70% Identity90% Identity95% Identity100% Identity
UniProt GroupQ9HYR3
Sequence Annotations
Expand
  • Reference Sequence
Experimental Data & Validation

Experimental Data

  • Method: X-RAY DIFFRACTION
  • Resolution: 2.05 Å
  • R-Value Free:  0.246 (Depositor), 0.240 (DCC) 
  • R-Value Work:  0.211 (Depositor), 0.200 (DCC) 
  • R-Value Observed: 0.213 (Depositor) 
Space Group: P 65
Unit Cell:
Length ( Å )Angle ( ˚ )
a = 74.368α = 90
b = 74.368β = 90
c = 161.097γ = 120
Software Package:
Software NamePurpose
PHENIXrefinement
SCALEPACKdata scaling
PHASERphasing
REFMACrefinement
PDB_EXTRACTdata extraction
HKL-3000data reduction
HKL-3000data scaling
DENZOdata reduction

Structure Validation

View Full Validation Report



Ligand Structure Quality Assessment 

Created with Raphaël 2.3.0Worse 01 BetterLigand structure goodness of fit to experimental dataBest fitted DOGClick on this verticalbar to view details

Entry History 

Deposition Data

Revision History  (Full details and data files)

  • Version 1.0: 2013-06-26
    Type: Initial release
  • Version 1.1: 2013-08-14
    Changes: Database references
  • Version 1.2: 2013-09-18
    Changes: Database references
  • Version 1.3: 2013-09-25
    Changes: Database references
  • Version 1.4: 2017-11-15
    Changes: Refinement description
  • Version 1.5: 2019-07-17
    Changes: Data collection, Refinement description
  • Version 1.6: 2024-02-28
    Changes: Data collection, Database references, Derived calculations, Refinement description