5BVS | pdb_00005bvs

Linoleate-bound pFABP4


Experimental Data Snapshot

  • Method: X-RAY DIFFRACTION
  • Resolution: 2.20 Å
  • R-Value Free: 
    0.226 (Depositor), 0.230 (DCC) 
  • R-Value Work: 
    0.187 (Depositor), 0.190 (DCC) 
  • R-Value Observed: 
    0.189 (Depositor) 

wwPDB Validation   3D Report Full Report


Ligand Structure Quality Assessment 

Created with Raphaël 2.3.0Worse 01 BetterLigand structure goodness of fit to experimental dataBest fitted EICClick on this verticalbar to view details

This is version 1.2 of the entry. See complete history


Literature

Structural basis for the ligand-binding specificity of fatty acid-binding proteins (pFABP4 and pFABP5) in gentoo penguin

Lee, C.W.Kim, J.E.Do, H.Kim, R.O.Lee, S.G.Park, H.H.Chang, J.H.Yim, J.H.Park, H.Kim, I.C.Lee, J.H.

(2015) Biochem Biophys Res Commun 465: 12-18

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2015.07.087
  • Primary Citation of Related Structures:  
    5BVQ, 5BVS, 5BVT

  • PubMed Abstract: 

    Fatty acid-binding proteins (FABPs) are involved in transporting hydrophobic fatty acids between various aqueous compartments of the cell by directly binding ligands inside their β-barrel cavities. Here, we report the crystal structures of ligand-unbound pFABP4, linoleate-bound pFABP4, and palmitate-bound pFABP5, obtained from gentoo penguin (Pygoscelis papua), at a resolution of 2.1 Å, 2.2 Å, and 2.3 Å, respectively. The pFABP4 and pFABP5 proteins have a canonical β-barrel structure with two short α-helices that form a cap region and fatty acid ligand binding sites in the hydrophobic cavity within the β-barrel structure. Linoleate-bound pFABP4 and palmitate-bound pFABP5 possess different ligand-binding modes and a unique ligand-binding pocket due to several sequence dissimilarities (A76/L78, T30/M32, underlining indicates pFABP4 residues) between the two proteins. Structural comparison revealed significantly different conformational changes in the β3-β4 loop region (residues 57-62) as well as the flipped Phe60 residue of pFABP5 than that in pFABP4 (the corresponding residue is Phe58). A ligand-binding study using fluorophore displacement assays shows that pFABP4 has a relatively strong affinity for linoleate as compared to pFABP5. In contrast, pFABP5 exhibits higher affinity for palmitate than that for pFABP4. In conclusion, our high-resolution structures and ligand-binding studies provide useful insights into the ligand-binding preferences of pFABPs based on key protein-ligand interactions.


  • Organizational Affiliation

    Division of Polar Life Sciences, Korea Polar Research Institute, Incheon 406-840, Republic of Korea; Department of Polar Sciences, University of Science and Technology, Incheon 406-840, Republic of Korea.


Macromolecules
Find similar proteins by:  (by identity cutoff)  |  3D Structure
Entity ID: 1
MoleculeChains Sequence LengthOrganismDetailsImage
Fatty acid-binding protein
A, B
132Pygoscelis papuaMutation(s): 0 
UniProt
Find proteins for A0A0K0MJN3 (Pygoscelis papua)
Explore A0A0K0MJN3 
Go to UniProtKB:  A0A0K0MJN3
Entity Groups  
Sequence Clusters30% Identity50% Identity70% Identity90% Identity95% Identity100% Identity
UniProt GroupA0A0K0MJN3
Sequence Annotations
Expand
  • Reference Sequence
Experimental Data & Validation

Experimental Data

  • Method: X-RAY DIFFRACTION
  • Resolution: 2.20 Å
  • R-Value Free:  0.226 (Depositor), 0.230 (DCC) 
  • R-Value Work:  0.187 (Depositor), 0.190 (DCC) 
  • R-Value Observed: 0.189 (Depositor) 
Space Group: P 61
Unit Cell:
Length ( Å )Angle ( ˚ )
a = 60.487α = 90
b = 60.487β = 90
c = 139.569γ = 120
Software Package:
Software NamePurpose
REFMACrefinement
Cootmodel building
HKL-2000data processing

Structure Validation

View Full Validation Report



Ligand Structure Quality Assessment 

Created with Raphaël 2.3.0Worse 01 BetterLigand structure goodness of fit to experimental dataBest fitted EICClick on this verticalbar to view details

Entry History 

Deposition Data

Revision History  (Full details and data files)

  • Version 1.0: 2015-08-05
    Type: Initial release
  • Version 1.1: 2015-09-16
    Changes: Database references
  • Version 1.2: 2024-11-20
    Changes: Data collection, Database references, Derived calculations, Structure summary